Ok, So maybe two posts in one day was a bit to ambitious? I've only just got used to doing a post every few days! But to my own credit i did start this last night with the intention of posting two in one day! So give the boy a biscuit. :) - So, My thoughts on The Amazing Spider-Man.
Well, to kick off, This film was pretty damn epic. I really enjoyed it the whole way thorough and the mixture between Action and No Action was perfect to the point that just as you were thinking about Huffing, Or puffing in boredom. BOOM! Action Sequence. :D
Lets begin with the cast shall we? Andrew Garfield and Emma Stone. Absolutely perfect match. The plot line merges so well with the interaction between both Andrew and Emma so that the screen play actually becomes enthralling to a pretty awesome level, Furthermore the “Bad-Guy” Dr. Curt Connors (Rhys Ifans) has that perfect image of ‘Mad (but fragile) scientist’ with the opposite persona of a strong minded, dismembered man. Just perfect.
The basic plot-line of the film follows that of a different route than the original trilogy of films which were otherwise directed by Sam Raimi. This new breed of Spider-Man film has gone down a route which appeared to me to be more of a ‘Realistic’ approach, Which is very strange for a Superhero movie but quite refreshing. (Although, this is the direction of the comic book “The Amazing Spider-Man”). Instead of shooting his web from the wrist directly, Its done via the technological advancements of ‘OsCorp’ which is a central company and building upon which most of the film is set around. Also, it seems that director Marc Webb (Ironic Name) has opted to keep in some of the little things that i notice. One of which being able to see the zipper which Peter uses to wear the Spider Suit. This, as little as it seems, keeps the character of Spider-Man a lot more human rather than just a mask and an unknown person. Also, as far as I'm aware, in the Raimi films – You never see Peter actually putting the suit on?
Moving on, I freaking loved the 3-D. Obviously it seems as some points in the film the 3D isn't essential. But some of the scenes were certainly enhanced greatly than viewing in 2D. One of the pinnacle 3D moments of the film has to be the moment where Spider-Man is web swinging along several cranes. A camera angle taken from a Birds-Eye view perspective displaying Peter being flung upwards and downwards whilst swinging along definitely made watching the film in 3D a lot more enjoyable. If you have the funding i would almost certainly try and view this in 3D although i wouldn't say its something that will overall completely change the experience – It did enhance it.
The Camera work was pretty special too. Obviously you had your basic angles which are used in many different films, Your close ups and your wide shots. But as well as the Birds-Eye view i explained above, Another angle which i thought was totally awesome and haven't seen before was used. Some sections of the film have a First-Person perspective camera which was used during the scenes in which Peter, as Spider-Man, is slinging around the city of New York with his newly discovered Powers. This angle, i thought, imitated that of the perspective camera used in the Mirrors Edge game, and was absolutely stunning. Especially where Peter swings and attach’s to a reflective building allowing you to see yourself as Spider-Man. A truly exhilarating moment.
Finally, My overall thoughts. Well, having seen only two of the original three Sam Raimi films. I couldn't fully comment on the comparison if this film and the original’s. But from what I've seen in Spider-Man 1 and 2. Marc Webb has defiantly taken this up a notch. The visuals were completely stunning. Action was plenty. Love and intimacy was, as usual in Superhero films, there. Casting was brilliant. And just an absolutely perfect corner stone to set the bar for a sequel or even another trilogy?
Overall Rating: 9/10 (Some tiny things which i feel it needed otherwise – Awesome)
Until next time people… Farewell.